A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath said once it has reserved an order on a application for stay on the proceedings before it in the matter, it cannot pass any such order or "commit" anything.
"Sorry we cannot allow you (Delhi government) to come up with new application," the court said, adding that "we will not commit on anything once the matter is reserved".
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for Delhi government, informed the court that they are urging the court to pass the order on stay application first so that they have enough time to approach the appropriate authority.
"If the court declines to entertain the application, we will have time to move the appropriate authority," Jaising told the court.
On May 24, the high court had reserved its decision on the
application moved by Delhi government seeking a stay on the proceedings on the petitions arising out of its standoff with the LG over powers to appoint bureaucrats in the national capital and other issues.
It had said the high court does not have the jurisdiction to deal with such dispute. The Supreme Court is the forum for adjudication of disputes of federal nature, it had added.
He had said that power of high courts cannot be ousted as Article 226 is a part of the doctrine of basic structure of the Constitution.
Delhi government had on May 28 last year approached the high court challenging the Centre's notification of May 21 giving the LG absolute powers to appoint bureaucrats in the city.
It had also challenged the July 23, 2014 notification limiting the jurisdiction of the Anti-Corruption Branch to Delhi government officials only.
The AAP government had also moved the apex court recently, seeking its intervention in the dispute with the Centre, while pointing out that the Union government, acting through the LG, had opposed most of the executive decisions taken by it.
