HC declines to quash charge sheet

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jun 09 2016 | 8:22 PM IST
Observing that a child would look at his or her parents as a role model, the Madras High Court today declined to quash a charge sheet filed against an advocate on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Coonoor, Nilgiris district.
Justice P.N.Prakash was dismissing a criminal original petition filed by G.Mohanraj, an advocate, seeking to quash the charge sheet against him.
"The child would look at the parents as its role model and would imbibe their qualities and character. The petitioner G. Mohanraj, who belongs to a noble profession, cannot conduct himself in an unbecoming manner and bring disrepute to legal fraternity," the judge said, referring to a poem in Tamil classic 'Thirukkural'.
The matter relates to Mohanraj's son, who was studying in class V in Holy Innocents High School Wellington, Nilgiris. He was found to be very mischievous and ill-behaved and his teachers had sent for his parents to meet the Principal of the school in January, 2009.
The Principal had alleged that when Mohanraj turned up, he spoke rudely to her and said being a lawyer he would close down the school. The Principal summoned the teachers. Mohanraj allegedly made disparaging remarks against them and shot some videos of the teachers.
Irked by the behavior, the Principal informed police. However, when the police came, he agreed to amicably settle the issue with the school management.
When the Principal requested Mohanraj to return the video footage, her request was not acceded to following which she lodged a complaint on February 6, 2009 before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Western Region - Coimbatore, based on which police registered a case under various IPC sections.
After completing the investigation, police filed a charge sheet.
Rejecting the contentions of the counsel for petitioner that the entire prosecution was vitiated, the judge said the Principal had no ulterior motive against the petitioner for foisting a false case against them.
Dismissing the petition, the judge also directed the jurisdictional court to expeditiously proceed with the trial of the case as the incident had happened in 2009.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 09 2016 | 8:22 PM IST

Next Story