A petition, seeking relief even before detention orders are passed, is not maintainable under law, Justice K K Sasidharan observed dismissing the plea of Tamil Arasu, who apprehended detention under the stringent act.
The Judge said mere apprehension cannot be a reason to direct the state to produce the records and to disclose as to whether the designated authority has any proposal to detain him.
There was no statutory provision requiring the authorities to disclose the materials collected by them to detain a particular person under the Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982 (Goondas Act), he said.
Several PMK leaders, facing charges of inciting violence on the basis of casete, had been detained under the Goondas Act and the National Security Act in the past few months.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
