HC expresses unhappiness over appointments in district schools

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Sep 03 2013 | 11:25 PM IST
Expressing unhappiness over appointments of sweepers and watchmen for the Higher Secondary and High Schools in Usilampatti Educational district, the Madras High Court Bench here today asked District Educational Officers of Madurai and Melur to submit the relevant papers.
Justice S.Nagamuthu said the Right to Information Act has worked at least in getting the facts for the petitioner on appointments.
The judge made the observation after seeing the report of the Usilampatti DEO who had mentioned in his selection list that recommendations made by MLA and Ministers had been taken into consideration for appointments.
The Usilampatti official said ten appointments were made on merit and ten on recommendations. A note put up by the office superintendent also mentioned that the Director of School Education Office instructed to appoint those recommended by the politicians.
Hearing a petition filed by one K.Ganesan,an SC community candidate and a physically challenged person, the Judge observed "Now I think throughout Tamil Nadu this type of unfair appointments would have taken place. I think a CBI probe may have to be ordered."
The Judge was also annoyed about papers being removed from the file submitted by the Melur and Madurai DEOs and asked "Is this the way you maintain files regarding appointments?"
The petitioner submitted the selection process was "unfair and "per se illegal and unconstitutional." It defeated the very purpose of social justice and equal opportunity for all. By making appointments on the recommendations of the politicians, the DEO of Usilampatti had defeated the constitutional guarantees, the petitioner charged.
The petitioner prayed that the court call for records on the selection process of sweepers and watchmen and quash the appointment in Usilampatti district for 2012-13, and order for fresh appointments.
The Additional Advocate General sought time to get instructions after which the Judge posted the case for hearing on September 6.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 03 2013 | 11:25 PM IST

Next Story