A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra, which upheld the conviction of the 41-year-old man, showed leniency in his sentence while considering that he has a wife and three children to look after.
"In the circumstances it is considered essential that the sentence imposed upon the accused/the offender/the appellant herein Ashok Bind acts as a deterrent and is simultaneously reformative with a prospect of rehabilitation," it said.
"Adequate counselling being provided to the appellant to be sensitised to understand why he was in prison," it said.
The court, however, upheld the Rs 10,000 fine imposed on Bind.
The order came on an appeal filed by Bind against the trial court's September 2016 verdict by which he was held guilty of murdering a boy and sentenced to life imprisonment.
As per the prosecution, Bind had killed the man, a resident of Deoria in Uttar Pradesh, on June 9, 2013 after he got annoyed on being denied a place to sit on a bench at New Delhi Railway Station where the victim was sleeping.
Kumar, who had come to Delhi along with his friend for Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSB) exams, was taken to a nearby hospital where he was declared dead on arrival.
Based on the circumstantial evidence, medical reports and the testimony of victim's friend, the trial court had handed Bind a life term.
The high court, while deciding his appeal, took a lenient view and modified the sentence saying if it was feasible for jail authorities, the man should be given educational opportunity, vocational training and skill development programme to enable a livelihood option.
The bench said that Bind be protected from getting associated with anti-social groups, agencies of moral hazards (like gambling dens, drinking places and brothels) and with demoralised and deprived persons.
It also asked the jail authorities to allow Bind to keep contact with his family members as per the jail rules and in accordance with the Model Prison Manual.
"Furthermore, it is directed that a bi-annual report is submitted by the Superintendent, Tihar Jail, to this court till the date of release, of the measures being adopted for reformation and rehabilitation of the appellant," the court said in its 32-page judgement.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
