HC pulls up TANGEDCO for seeking adjournments

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jun 19 2014 | 12:01 AM IST
Pulling up Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited for seeking adjournment on one reason or other in a case relating to conferring permanent status on daily workers, the Madras High Court today imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on it while granting adjournment.
Posting further hearing to July 11, Justice M Sathyanarayanan said the cost shall be paid by TANGEDCO to its workmen, cited as respondents in the case, on or before July 9.
On a dispute raised by one K Palanimalai and 81 daily workers, the Labour Inspector had passed an order in 2007 conferring permanent status on them. As it was not complied with, they moved the High Court which had in February 2011 directed TANGEDCO to comply with the order in 12 weeks. Since this too was not done, they filed contempt applications.
TANGEDCO challenged the 2007 order and Justice K Chandru had on March 27, 2012 dismissed the petition. The appeal preferred by it was also dismissed.
The Special Leave Petition filed by TANGEDCO was also dismissed by the Supreme Court which however said it would not preclude the petitioner from applying for review.
Hence TANGEDCO filed the present review applications.
When the case came up for hearing, TANGEDCO counsel sought further time. However, the counsel for workmen opposed it, pointing out that though the orders, which are the subject matter of contempt, were passed in February 2011, they were yet to be implemented and the applicants were adopting dilatory tactics.
Justice Sathyanarayanan said though the contempt petitions were entertained on Aug 19, 2011, TANGEDCO had thought it fit to challenge the orders conferring permanent status belatedly by filing petitions which were dismissed by a common order. The appeals against the order had also been dismissed, he noted.
The judge said conduct of the review applicants disclosed they were seeking adjournment on one reason or the other, which, on the face of it, is found to be unreasonable.
As TANGEDCO counsel had prayed for one more adjournment to enable him to move miscellaneous petitions in the applications to review the orders passed, all these cases are adjourned to July 11, the judge added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 19 2014 | 12:01 AM IST

Next Story