Justice C.T.Selvam of the Court's Madurai Bench said if the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) found discrepancy in Form Six (application for inclusion in electoral roll), he could have rejected them.
Without a making proper inquiry about forgery and impersonation, cases could not be registered, he said. The petitioners submitted that they merely forwarded the applications in May, 2005 for inclusion of new voters after the Election Commission relaxed the norms for submitting the applications.
Without sending the forms to forensic experts, the forgery cases had been filed against them. The cases were pending in various districts including Theni and Kanyakumari.
The petitioners submitted that it was a clear case of political vendetta and misuse and abuse of power and sought quashing of the cases.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
