A bench of justices N Kirubakaran and V Parthiban sought the report while quashing an FIR against a group of supporters of Naam Tamizhar Katchi which had staged a protest against the opening of a TASMAC Indian-Made Foreign Liquor shop in a residential area in Thirumullaivoil here.
The bench suo motu made the state home secretary, the director general of police, the Chennai police commissioner and the general manager of TASMAC as parties to the issue and asked from them the status reports on the situation and posted the matter for further hearing on June 12.
The bench gave its order while adjudicating the bail pleas of one Prasanna and 20 others, arrested for their recent protest against opening of the liquor outlet.
Noting that the only violent act alleged to have been committed by the petitioners was setting afire a flex board in front of the shop, the court directed them to pay Rs 1,000 to the state legal aid services authority.
"No doubt demonstration should be staged without any violence... It is very difficult to assess the mood of the masses and this kind of things (setting fire to flex board) cannot be avoided when an agitation is staged," it said.
The judges, however, made it clear that the observation does not mean that the court was encouraging any violence.
"Any form of violence should be discouraged and deprecated," the bench said ordering the petitioners to pay a fine of Rs Rs 1,000 in a week to the state's Legal Services Authority for setting afire the flex board.
It directed the authorities to submit details on the agitations staged against TASMAC shops, violence, if any, and the arrests made so far in this regard.
The court also sought to know about the political parties involved in these agitations, the number of persons injured in the possible incidents of lathicharge by police, the number of shops relocated and the list of damages to the public properties.
The state has been witnessing sporadic protests by the residents against relocation of liquor shops following the closures of the ones falling within 500 meters of the highways as per the apex court order.
The incident triggered a public outrage following which the government cancelled the licence of the shop and ordered an inquiry.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
