HC rejects Gammon plea against rejection of its bid for metro

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 15 2015 | 10:22 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today dismissed Gammon India Ltd's plea challenging DMRC's decision to reject its bid for a Rs 600 crore tender for building eight metro stations in the national capital.
A bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva said a technical evaluation committee of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) had concluded that Gammon's bid was not suitable and acceptable for award of the contract and the view appeared to be bona fide and cannot be faulted.
The expert committee had concluded that the company's bid was not suitable and acceptable for award of the tender and as such was technically non-responsive and non-compliant.
"The evaluation by the expert committee appears to be bona fide and as such, the same cannot be faulted. In view of the above, we find no merit in the petition and accordingly the same is dismissed but with no orders as to costs," the court said.
"It cannot be held that the Technical Committee and the Tender Evaluation Committee are only to examine the bid to ascertain whether the requisite documents have been submitted or not and are not to evaluate the bids/proposals to ascertain whether the bidder is suitable and the bid is acceptable or not," it also said.
"If the requirement was only the former then there would be no requirement to constitute a technical committee of experts who are specialists in the field," it said.
The bench refused to accept Gammon's contention that material other than what was called for could not have been taken into account, saying "If some material adverse to the bidder comes to the knowledge of the employer, the employer cannot be expected to ignore the same..."
The court also refused to accept Gammon's argument that taking into account adverse material would amount to its blacklisting, saying "blacklisting would occur where the petitioner (Gammon) is prohibited from participating in all contracts during the stipulated period."
"Petitioner has not been prohibited from participating. The said finding would not ipso facto apply to all subsequent tenders," it said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 15 2015 | 10:22 PM IST

Next Story