A bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva said a technical evaluation committee of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) had concluded that Gammon's bid was not suitable and acceptable for award of the contract and the view appeared to be bona fide and cannot be faulted.
The expert committee had concluded that the company's bid was not suitable and acceptable for award of the tender and as such was technically non-responsive and non-compliant.
"It cannot be held that the Technical Committee and the Tender Evaluation Committee are only to examine the bid to ascertain whether the requisite documents have been submitted or not and are not to evaluate the bids/proposals to ascertain whether the bidder is suitable and the bid is acceptable or not," it also said.
The bench refused to accept Gammon's contention that material other than what was called for could not have been taken into account, saying "If some material adverse to the bidder comes to the knowledge of the employer, the employer cannot be expected to ignore the same..."
The court also refused to accept Gammon's argument that taking into account adverse material would amount to its blacklisting, saying "blacklisting would occur where the petitioner (Gammon) is prohibited from participating in all contracts during the stipulated period."
