HC rejects plea to reconstitute CBI team to trace missing boy

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 25 2014 | 10:23 PM IST
The Madras High Court today rejected a plea of the father of a 17-year-old boy to hand over the probe into the teenager's disappearance three years ago to a new CBI team of officers from north India, holding that it will be "sowing seeds of balkanisation" of the country if it accedes to such requests.
"Adverting to the request for constituting a new team of officers from North India, we feel that the request cannot be countenanced. India is divided into North, East, West, South only for geographical reasons to measure monsoon and drought and nothing more. The bureaucracy which is the steel frame of our country is one single organic entity and we will be sowing seeds of balkanisation of this country if we accede to such requests," a division bench of justices S Rajeswaran and P N Prakash said in its order.
The matter pertains to the mysterious disappearance of Sushil Mandal's son, a class IX student at a private school at Hosur, who left home at 8pm on October 15, 2011, and did not return.
Mandal had alleged that his son was kidnapped and kept in illegal detention by an Inspector of Central Excise, SIPCOT in Hosur with whose daughter his son had a friendship.
Police had registered his complaint. Meanwhile an unidentified decomposed body was fished out from a lake at Hosur on October 24.
The bench said as the petitioner was not satisfied with the investigation by local police, the probe was then transferred to the CB-CID and then again to the CBI.
Mandal said the decomposed body was not that of his son and filed a Habeas Corpus petition in the high court following which a CBI probe was ordered.
CBI investigations along with forensic and DNA test reports revealed that the body was that of Mandal's son.
Not satisfied with the report filed by CBI, he filed another petition to entrust the investigation to a team of officers of North Indian wing of CBI, which was rejected by the bench.
Closing the Habeas Corpus petition, the bench in its order directed the CBI to continue the investigation and also directed it to find out the mystery in the case. It also directed the CBI to investigate whether the SIPCOT Police tried to shield any guilty in the case.
"We find no justifiable reasons to reconstitute the investigation team as sought for by the counsel for the petitioner," the bench concluded.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 25 2014 | 10:23 PM IST

Next Story