Passing interim orders on a PIL, a division bench comprising Justice Satish K Agnihotri and Justice K K Sasidharan issued notice to the Deputy Registrar of the Southern Bench of the NGT returnable by January 22 next.
The NGT was constituted for speedy disposal of cases relating to environment. It was not a substitute for High Court in all respects. It should act within four corners of the statute, the court said.
The Bench, quoting an order of the Supreme Court, restrained the NGT's Southern Bench from taking Suo Motu Proceedings and posted the matter to January 22 for further hearing.
Petitioner Sunderrajan, an advocate and associated with 'Poovulagin Nanbargal', a pro-ecological outfit, submitted that the NGT was constituted under the provisions of the NGT ACT 2010 which had given specified powers to it to adjudicate disputes between the parties.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
