HC seeks NIA response on plea of suspected IM operatives

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 19 2013 | 7:05 PM IST
The National Investigation Agency was today asked by the Delhi High Court to file its response on a plea by two suspected Indian Mujahideen operatives, who are also accused in Pune blast, against extension of probe period from 90 to 180 days in a case registered by the agency.
A bench of justices V K Bhasin and V P Vaish directed the NIA to file its response by August 8 on the plea by Syed Maqbool and Imran Khan challenging the trial court order which allowed the agency's plea for extension of the probe period in a case of their alleged involvement in hatching a conspiracy to carry out terror strikes in the country.
The two, who also accused in the August 2012 Pune blasts case, had contended that the order was a serious violation of their right to life.
They have said in their appeal that "the NIA court had erroneously and unjustifiably, without appreciating the law as prescribed under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act granted extension in period of investigation as well as their judicial custody."
The appeal said the period of 90 days after their arrest was to expire on May 29 but the NIA moved the plea for extension of probe period on May 23, which was allowed by the court.
It said the trial court has "without any specific reason, in a ritualistic manner without addressing the contentions raised and case laws cited by the counsel for the accused, through an unreasoned order and without application of mind allowed the application seeking 90 day extension...."
It said that UAPA law mandated senior prosecutor to necessarily file a report on probe agency's plea for extension of probe period but in this case the report was prepared within minutes and there is not even a whisper about the need for further detention.
The NIA had on July 17 filed charge sheet against Imran and Syed and three others -- Mohammad Danish Ansari, Mohammad Aftab Alam and Obaid-Ur-Rehman -- under various penal provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and the IPC relating to conspiracy to commit certain offences against the state.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 19 2013 | 7:05 PM IST

Next Story