HC slams practise of issuing 'recommendation letters' for bail

Image
Press Trust of India Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Jun 23 2017 | 10:42 PM IST
The Gujarat High Court today came down heavily on the practice of elected representatives issuing letters recommending bail for prisoners, saying it amounts to an attempt to influence the judiciary.
This has become a common practice and reflects "direct nexus" between the elected persons and the prisoners, it said.
"It constitutes a direct interference in judicial functions of the court. The court does not need recommendations from any elected personality to perform its judicial functions," said a division bench of justices Abhilasha Kumari and A J Shastri in its order today.
"Further, it reveals a direct nexus between such elected representatives and convicted persons," the order said.
The bench was hearing a bail plea filed by Sandip Chauhan, a rape convict.
With his plea seeking 30-day temporary bail to 'help the family financially,' Chauhan had attached a letter by Bharuch municipality councillor Babubhai Vasava, who 'recommended' to the court that Chauhan be granted bail.
Taking a strong exception, the high court summoned Vasava, who today remained present and tendered apology for issuing the letter.
"The issuance of such a certificate is a thoroughly unauthorised act on the part of the councillor. Not only is this act beyond the scope of the duties to be performed by a councillor, it constitutes a direct interference in the judicial functions of the court," the HC said in its order.
"Unauthorised use of official letterheads and seals by councillors such as Babubhai Vasava is being noticed by us in several applications," the judges said.
The bench turned down the bail application, saying that grounds mentioned in it were "vague and unconvincing."
The court also directed the state urban development department to come up with guidelines "to curb this malpractice" (of issuing recommendation letters).
The bench, in another case, made similar observations while hearing a bail plea of a murder convict who had attached recommendation letter from a sarpanch.
The court slammed the woman sarpanch (who was not present) for issuing the letter.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 23 2017 | 10:42 PM IST

Next Story