HC stays notices to top cop, others by Delhi Assembly

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 05 2015 | 4:42 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today stayed till July 1 the show cause notices issued to the police by Delhi Assembly's Privileges Committee on MLA Jarnail Singh's complaint alleging breach of privilege.
Vacation judge Justice Mukta Gupta passed the order while issuing notice to and seeking reply of Delhi Assembly, its Privileges Committee and Jarnail Singh on plea of Commissioner of Police, Deputy Commissioner of Police (West District) and Station House Officer (SHO) of Tilak Nagar who were recipients of show cause notices on the MLA's complaint.
"Till next date of hearing, operation of impugned order be stayed," the court said and listed the matter for further hearing on July 1.
The court also observed that if it was accepted there was breach of privilege in the instant case, "then it would mean no FIR could be lodged against an MLA".
The Privileges Committee had on May 22 issued show cause notices on Singh's plea that police officials committed breach of privilege by claiming he was absconding after an FIR was lodged against him for allegedly interfering with duty of an MCD engineer trying to demolish an alleged illegal construction.
Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain contended that the allegations raised by Singh in his complaint do not constitute breach of privilege as such statements were allegedly made by the police commissioner after an FIR was registered against the MLA and investigation was ongoing and because his first anticipatory bail plea was rejected by the trial court on May 2.
Singh has alleged that the SHO of Tilak Nagar police station had insulted him.
Refuting the allegations made by Singh in his complaint, the ASG, assisted by advocate Neeraj Jain, questioned whether an MLA was "immune" to law and added that the show cause notices were issued on May 22 without jurisdiction.
He said the MLA lodged the complaint with the Privilege Committee on May 11 after he was granted anticipatory bail by the high court, and the panel in a meeting held on May 14 took cognisance of it.
The plea, filed on behalf of the police officers, has sought quashing of the show cause notices saying Singh did not possess any privilege when he obstructed, illegally detained and beat up a public servant as well as tore away official orders.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 05 2015 | 4:42 PM IST

Next Story