A Narayanan, director of NGO Change India, had challenged the appointment, contending that the mandatory pre-appointment rules had not been followed in her case.
When the petition came up, the court said, "It is quite obvious that the process has not been followed. We put the learned Advocate General whether he would like to review the issue himself and advise the government appropriately or it would be necessary for judicial intervention, especially keeping in mind the judgment of the Division Bench of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court."
Earlier, when the matter came up on September 2, the court had said, "The appointment prima facie appears to be in breach of the affidavit furnished to this court."
"The records be, thus, produced in respect of the recruitment process, for us to scrutinise, where after we will examine as to whether suo motu quo warranto petition should be issued questioning the appointment of the chairperson in breach of the sworn affidavit of the state government."
Her academic tenure, however, was marked by allegations of inappropriate appointments, instigated assaults on her critics and general campus unrest.
Kalyani's present appointment pertains to an earlier PIL by Narayanan seeking mandatory registration of child care homes and to close down illegal homes not maintaining minimum facilities.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
