A bench of Justices P C Ghose and U U Lalit also refused to accept the prayer of the civic body that the premier hotel be restrained from taking any fresh booking beyond March 31.
"After looking at the facts and circumstances of the case and balancing the situation, we direct status quo with regard to the hotel," it said.
Regarding the prayer of New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) that no fresh booking in the hotel should be allowed, the bench said, "It is very difficult to restrain fresh bookings for a running hotel. Everything will be decided when we hear the matter in January."
"I (IHCL) have built the brand, I have created the brand, at least tell me a price. If I unable to pay or refuse to pay then you (NDMC) can proceed as you wish. They should give me first right of refusal," Salve said.
Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain, appearing for NDMC, said that the property was owned by the civic body and was given to IHCL on a lease of 33 years which expired in 2011.
"We are the licensor. We paid for the building and we paid for everything. They do not have any vested right to seek renewal of license. It was upto the NDMC to consider whether to renew their license or not," Jain said.
The bench, however, posted the matter for further hearing in the second week of January, saying everything will be decided "when we hear the matter".
The firm had challenged the October 27 verdict delivered by a division bench of high court which had dismissed IHCL's petition challenging the move by NDMC to auction the property.
The high court had dismissed IHCL's plea, saying the company has "no right" for renewal of the licence period and NDMC was "within its power" to secure maximum consideration for grant of licence for the property situated at the prime location of 1, Man Singh Road in Lutyen's Delhi.
IHCL had moved the division bench of high court against the September 5 judgement of a single judge who had not acceded to the firm's request for renewal of licence for a further period, saying it was not entitled for the extension.
NDMC had in January this year said it was in the process of assessing the assets of the hotel in preparation for the much-delayed auction.
IHCL had earlier approached the single judge bench seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining NDMC from interfering in any manner with the possession, right to operate, run and maintain the hotel premises.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
