While observing that "important steps" have been taken in recent years to develop the country's macroprudential policy framework, FSB said the authorities also need to consider potential policy trade-offs in the future.
According to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) additional work is needed to flesh out and operationalise a comprehensive macroprudential policy framework.
"Much of this work relates to making macroprudential policy-setting more explicit, with clearer boundaries between authorities and with other policies, as well as in balancing the objectives of promoting financial development and inclusion," its peer review report of India said.
India is represented by RBI, Sebi and the Finance Ministry at FSB.
The report said it would be useful for RBI's systemic risk analysis to become more policy-oriented so that it can support decision-making for macroprudential purposes.
Having a standardised set of indicators for assessment of risks could also be used by the FSDC (Financial Stability and Development Council) to discuss systemic risks and policy responses.
While it is understandable that financial development and inclusion are key policy objectives, FSB said they could in principle occasionally come into conflict with maintaining financial stability.
At present, RBI carries out banking system stress tests
mainly applying scenarios directly to banks' balance sheets and the same could be enhanced in various ways, FSB said.
"Models could be further developed to assess the impact of adverse macro scenarios on banks' borrowers, especially those most at risk, and then, in turn, how a deterioration in their balance sheets would feed back to banks' own balance sheets.
Further, FSB said authorities should continue to develop techniques that assess financial stability risks outside the banking sector, including linkages between banks and other financial institutions and markets and the impact of external shocks on capital flows.
According to FSB, it would be useful to continue increasing the coverage and consistency of data on corporate balance sheets.
The peer review focused on macroprudential policy framework as well as the regulation and supervision of non- banking finance companies (NBFCs) and housing finance companies (HFCs).
Noting that progress has also been made with regard to NBFCs, the report said concerns about the risks from unregulated financial entities and unauthorised financial activities have strengthened the coordination of efforts by the authorities to survey the regulatory perimeter.
Even though it is typically small, problems in the NBFC sector can become systemic due to interconnectedness with the banking sector as well as due to their social and political ramifications, the report noted.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
