India rejects Pfizer's patent application for arthritis drug

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 07 2015 | 5:28 PM IST
India's patent office has again rejected US drug major Pfizer's new patent application for its rheumatoid arthritis medicine, tofacitinib, citing it did not enhance the efficacy of the existing approved drug.
"After having considered the submissions submitted by the applicant in the hearing, the written submission and amended claims filed... It is hereby ordered that the invention disclosed and claimed in the instant application... Is not considered as an invention under the provisions of the Act," Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Bharat N S said in an order.
The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in October last year set aside an order by the patent office which rejected Pfizer's patent for a new formula of the drug and directed it to re-consider the application.
"I do not admit that the claimed compound has enhanced efficacy over the base compound...And hence not patentable under Section 3(d) of Patents Act... And I therefore, hereby refuse this Application," Bharat added in his order.
Quoting a Supreme Court judgement, the order said that the applicant would have to establish the therapeutic enhanced efficacy of the claimed compound over the base compound.
"For the purposes of this clause, salts, esters, ethers, polymorphs, metabolites, pure form, particle size, isomers, mixtures of isomers, complexes, combinations and other derivatives of known substances shall be considered to be the same substance, unless they differ significantly in properties with regard to efficacy," he said.
When contacted, Pfizer said the company's base patent for Tofacitinib remains valid in India.
"Following this decision from IPAB, we are reviewing our options for further action," the company said.
Pfizer remains committed to innovation and the long-term viability of its research and development programmes for the benefit of patients and healthcare practitioners in India and across the world, it said.
The decision of the patent office assumes significance as multi-national drug companies have alleged that India's intellectual property rights (IPR) regime is not in compliance with the global norms.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 07 2015 | 5:28 PM IST

Next Story