Jaya's petition rejected by special court

Image
Press Trust of India Bangalore
Last Updated : Jan 24 2013 | 2:11 AM IST

B M Mallikarjunaiah rejected the petitions observing that there was no substantial ground in the contention of the petitioners that the present presiding officer in this case was not a special judge under section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act.

Jayalalithaa's counsel B Kumar and C Manishankhar appearing for her close aide and co-accused Sasikala Natarajan, then sought two weeks time to approach the high court to which the judge said "everytime time is sought to protract proceedings".

Assistant Special Public Prosecutor Sandesh Chowta opposed the plea stating "this can't be a ground to seek time".

Chowta submitted that the proceedings in the case should go on a day to day basis as per the directions of the Supreme Court, which had transferred the case to Bangalore.

The court then adjourned the case to July 24 for further recording of the statement of Sasikala, with a notice to the interpreter C Harish to be present on that day.

The court in its order observed that in furtherance of the order of transfer of the Supreme Court, more specifically, clause A and clause B, the notification (by High Court) in question is in order and accordance with section 3 of the PC Act.

The court held that there was no need for this court "to desist from hearing the present case". It also rejected the application filed yesterday for reopening and hearing the applications again.

Jayalalithaa had questioned Mallikarjunaiah's appointment as special judge, contending that the state government had not issued any specific notification for his appointment as stipulated by the section 3(1) of PC Act.

After previous judge A S Pachapure's elevation to the high court, only the high court has issued a notification, appointing him (Mallikarjunaiah) as special judge, while no notification by the state government has been issued.

The case relates to alleged accumulation of wealth to the tune of Rs 66 crore by Jayalalithaa disproportionate to her known sources of income when she was chief minister between 1991-95.

  

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 17 2012 | 6:05 PM IST

Next Story