Kodanadu case: Madras HC quashes detention order against key accused

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Nov 06 2019 | 6:30 PM IST

The Madras High Court on Wednesday quashed a preventive detention order against one of the key accused in the 2017 Kodanadu heist-and-murder case, holding the detention order was 'illegible' and suffered from various other lacunae.

Allowing a petition by detenue K V Sayan, a division bench of Justices MM Sundresh and RMT Teekaa Raman quashed the Nilgiris District Collector's order passed under the Goondas Act in March this year.

It held that several pages in the documents furnished to the petitioner were 'illegible' and the detention order suffered from non-application of mind and had other gaps.

"When they (documents) were furnished to the petitioner, they should be legible enough to read. That is the very object of furnishing copies of the documents relied upon... Therefore, on these grounds, the impugned detention order is liable to be set aside.," it said.

The bench also refuted the prosecution submissions that the detention order was not passed against the accused for giving media interview against Chief Minister k Palaniswami.

"...It is important to note that the detention order was passed after the remarks were made by the petitioner against the Honourable Chief Minister," it said.

Sayan and nine others have been arrested on the charges of killing Om Bahadur, a security guard at the bungalow in Kodanadu owned by late chief minister J Jayalalithaa, in 2017.

He was granted bail by a court in Udhagamandalam, but it cancelled the relief in February this year for violation of the bail condition.

The Tamil Nadu government had moved the court seeking cancellation of the bail after former Tehelka editor Mathew Samuel released a video in Delhi on January 11 in which Sayan and a co-accused linked Palaniswami's name to the case, a charge denied by the chief minister.

Sayan and the co-accused were arrested on January 14 in connection with the video but were released on bail by a Chennai court.

The Madras High Court had later stayed the FIR against them and four others, including Samuel in connection with the charges levelled in the 16-minute video clip.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 06 2019 | 6:30 PM IST

Next Story