Jaitley, who had first raised the debate few months ago when Opposition parties using their majority had stalled the GST Bill in Rajya Sabha, said the mandate of people is with the Lok Sabha or the Lower House which is directly elected.
On why the bonhomie witnessed in cricketing matters where leaders across party line dissolve differences in deciding the fate of the sport, is not witnessed in Parliamentary politics, he said: "Well politics is not cricket".
"If you see pragmatically the party character in India, I don't foresee in reasonable future a government which has at any point of time an absolute majority in the Upper House.
"We have political parties in the regions which are strong, they win their own regions, and therefore those who sit in the Centre as far as the Upper House is concerned will always be the balances," Jaitley said.
The minister was replying to a question on supremacy of Lok Sabha, which has already passed a bill to create a unified common market for all commodities (Goods and Services Tax), over Rajya Sabha.
Stating that the Lok Sabha is elected on a manifesto, he said, this was unlike Rajya Sabha which is elected by States.
Jaitley said that since 1991, when the reform process started, not a single legislation which has been abandoned altogether because the Upper House has been blocked.
"At the end of the day, through the checks and balances, amendments, alterations, consultations, consensus has been built. There have been delays, but there hasn't been an indefinite abandonment of any legislative measure," he said.
"We will have to either follow the practice we have been following that by consensus we come to a particular view otherwise you will have a situation in a bicameral system where indirectly elected Houses veto the decisions repeatedly of a directly elected House. Now Indian democracy will always have to find an answer to this," he said.
"Even if today, the matter is to be re discussed in Parliament, Parliament would be almost of the similar opinion ... I have always believed that the Court's view on this (NJAC) subject is final, at the same time I have also said it is not infallible. I do hope this error into which they have fallen in is corrected at some stage," he said.
The NDA government had in October suffered a setback with the Supreme Court striking down as NJAC Act which gave a major role to the executive in appointing judges to higher judiciary.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
