Madras High Court Chief Justice Vijaya K Tahilramani in an administrative order allocated civil contempt of court petitions to a designated bench and not before the judges whose orders have been disobeyed, which was the custom so far.
It is understood that this was done before she tendered her resignation to President Ram Nath Kovind, days after the Supreme Court Collegium declined her request for reconsideration of transfer to Meghalaya.
The decision of allocating petitions can have a direct impact on the contempt plea moved by court-appointed special officer Pon Manickavel against former Chief Secretary Girija Vaidyanathan and ex-DGP T K Rajendran for allegedly not obeying a special bench's order in idol theft cases and provide adequate infrastructure for the idol wing of the CID.
The contempt plea, which was so far heard by the bench of Justice Mahadevan and Justice Audikesavalu which originally passed the order, has been transferred to a division bench of Justice M M Sundresh and Justice R M T Teekaa Raman.
When the plea came up for hearing on Thursday, the bench headed by Justice Sundresh said they would simply adjourn the plea to September 19 as they needed time to understand the rationale behind the administrative order.
"The matter requires some thinking. Even the Bar has to think about the administrative order. We would call for a clarification from the registrar general," the bench said.
Earlier, the additional advocate general opposed the contempt plea and submitted that prima facie it is not maintainable as the state has already moved the Supreme Court on the appeal, which had made some modifications in its November 30, 2018 order.
On August 30, Pon Manickavel filed a sub-application in the contempt plea, alleging that the state government, in a bid to stall the inquiries of the idol wing CID into the alleged idol theft cases, had gone to the extent of refusing salary to even a sanitary worker deputed to it's Tiruchirapalli office.
Due to such acts of the state and total non-cooperation of other police officials, I couldn't even register a single FIR for the past eight months," Manickavel had alleged.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
