Malegaon witnesses' statements go missing

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Apr 07 2016 | 9:13 PM IST
Confessional statements of some witnesses in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case are reported to be "missing" from the special MCOCA court here, prompting the authorities to mount a search for those.
The issue came to light earlier this week when staff of the special court approached former Special Public Prosecutor Rohini Salian to inquire about whether she had with her some of the confessional statements of witnesses in the case.
"I was surprised when such a query was made to me. The court staff asked whether I had confessional statements of six or seven crucial witnesses recorded before a magistrate.
"I conveyed that all documents had been handed over to the new Special Public Prosecutor Avinash Rasal in presence of NIA officers and, in any case, the originals were in the court records only," Salian said.
The witnesses whose statements have gone missing include those of a close aide of Ramji Kalsangra who had "confessed" before a magistrate about the criminal conspiracy hatched to plant explosives in Malegaon in Maharashtra.
Two low-intensity explosions in Malegaon on September 29, 2008, had left seven people dead. The Maharashtra police's Anti Terrorist Squad, which investigated the case before it was handed over to CBI and later to NIA in 2011, arrested a dozen odd accused, including self-styled Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and serving Indian Army officer Lt Col Srikant Purohit.
Rasal, however, contended that the files were not missing and said, "They may have been misplaced and we are looking for them.
"You see, this case is being heard in various courts including Supreme Court of the country. There is a possibility that it could have been misplaced and it will be found," he said.
If Worse comes to worst and the statements are not found, the NIA will take the permission of the court and lead the xerox copies of the same statements as "secondary evidence".
Salian, however, contended that statements recorded under 164 are always primary evidence and the files going missing could have a bearing on the case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 07 2016 | 9:13 PM IST

Next Story