"The commonly accepted theory as to how the Moon was formed is that a Mars sized body collided with the proto-Earth and spun material into orbit," said Simon Lock, a graduate student at Harvard University in the US.
"That mass settled into a disk and later accreted to form the Moon. The body that was left after the impact was the Earth. This has been the canonical model for about 20 years," said Lock, co-author of the study published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.
"Getting enough mass into orbit in the canonical scenario is actually very difficult, and there is a very narrow range of collisions that might be able to do it," he said.
Tests have shown that the isotopic "fingerprint" for both the Earth and Moon are nearly identical, suggesting both came from the same source.
However, in the canonical story, the Moon formed mostly from the remnants of just one of the two bodies that collided.
Tests have shown that the Moon is far less abundant in many volatile elements - such as potassium, sodium and copper - that are relatively common on Earth.
"It is huge. It can be ten times the size of the Earth, and because there is so much energy in the collision, maybe 10 per cent of the rock of Earth is vapourised, and the rest is liquid...so the way you form the Moon out of a synestia is very different," Lock said.
It begins with a "seed" - a small amount of liquid rock that gathers just off the centre of the donut-like structure. As the structure cools, vapourised rock condenses and rains down towards the centre of the synestia. Some of the rain runs into the Moon, causing it to grow.
"Over time, the whole structure shrinks, and the Moon emerges from the vapour. Eventually, the whole synestia condenses and what's left is a ball of spinning liquid rock that eventually forms the Earth as we know it today," said Lock.
The whole process happens remarkably fast, with the Moon emerging from the synestia in just a few tens of years, and the Earth forming about 1,000 years later, he said.
"This new work explains features of the Moon that are hard to resolve with current ideas," said Sarah Stewart, a professor at University of California, Davis in the US.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
