NCDRC directs builder to pay Rs 10L to buyer

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 12 2017 | 3:57 PM IST
The apex consumer commission has directed a realtor to refund Rs 10 lakh to a home buyer, saying
the builder was "highly negligent" in completing the project.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) bench asked a north Delhi-based realtor Apex Buildtech Ltd to refund Rs 10 lakh along with Rs 40,000 as cost of litigation to West Delhi resident Madhu Talreja.
The NCDRC, while upholding the state commission's decision to dismiss the builder's appeal against a district forum's order, has noted that the realtor who promised to handover the possession in three years has not been able to do so even after 10 years of booking.
"It is obvious that even till date, the petitioner (builder) is not in a position to deliver the possession of the flat with clear title to the complainant. Hence, the opposite party (builder) was highly negligent in completing the project which obviously is a deficiency in service," the commission bench headed by its presiding member Justice Ajit Bharihoke said.
"The petitioner is a builder who has utilised the money of gullible consumer on the false promise that he would deliver the possession within 3 years which he has not been able to fulfill even after 10 years of booking," the commission said.
According to Talreja's complaint, she booked a residential flat in the group's housing project 'Apex Greens' at Sonipat in Haryana and deposited Rs 10 lakh with the firm.
A builder-buyer agreement between the parties was executed on October 20, 2007.
It further alleged that the agreement assured her the possession of flat within three years but the builder faulted.
The firm, however, denied that it had promised to hand over the flat within 3 years or that the construction of the project was delayed.
It also said that Talreja was at fault as she failed to make further payment of consideration amount.
However, the district forum asked it to refund Rs 10 lakh along with the cost against which the builder approached the state commission from where also he failed to gain relief.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 12 2017 | 3:57 PM IST

Next Story