NDA govt engaging pol parties on law for appointing judges

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 24 2014 | 6:47 PM IST
The NDA government has approached the major political parties on the need to bring a bill for appointment of senior judges with the move coming in the wake of revelations that the previous UPA regime had purportedly nudged the Supreme Court collegium to recommend an extension for a high court judge who was under corruption cloud.
The recent letter by Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to the leaders of major political parties stressing on the need for a bill to replace the present collegium system also comes against the backdrop of a controversy generated by the Centre's decision to return the recommendation of the Supreme Court collegium for appointment of senior lawyer Gopal Subramanium as an apex court judge.
Prasad had on July 21 said the government is seeking the views of various political parties and eminent jurists for setting up a Judicial Appointments Commission, which would scrap the present system of judges appointing judges.
The Centre plans to introduce the bill in the ongoing session after tweaking an earlier bill brought by the UPA government. Sources said the NDA government has found "certain infirmities" in the UPA version. They added that the Centre is also mulling an all-party meeting to discuss the matter.
A Constitutional Amendment Bill to set up the proposed commission has lapsed following the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha and an accompanying bill is pending in Rajya Sabha.
"The government is seeking the views of various political parties and eminent jurists on the proposal for setting up of a Judicial Appointments Commission," Prasad had said.
An earlier effort by the NDA-I government in 2003 to replace the collegium system met with no success. The then NDA government had introduced a Constitution amendment bill but Lok Sabha was dissolved when the bill was before a Standing Committee. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley was the Law Minister then.
The parliamentary nod to the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill eluded the UPA dispensation despite its having agreed to demands by jurists and BJP to grant constitutional status to a proposed commission for appointment and transfer of judges to the higher judiciary to ensure that its composition cannot be altered through an ordinary legislation.
According to the UPA bill, while a new Article 124A of the Constitution would define the composition of the JAC, Article 124B will define its functions.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 24 2014 | 6:47 PM IST

Next Story