New tech can convert thoughts into action

A revolutionary new technology can convert thoughts into action by transferring noninvasive measurements of human brain activity into control signals that drive physical devices and computer displays in real time, researchers say.
Neurofeedback can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio in thought, enabling a sharper focus on tasks - and a better understanding of brain-computer interfaces.
With advances in neurofeedback techniques, the signal-to-noise ratio of the brain activity underlying our thoughts can be remastered as well, according to recent discovery led by Stephen LaConte, an assistant professor at the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute.
LaConte and his colleagues specialise in real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging, a relatively new technology that can convert thought into action.

Crucially, for the ultimate goal of treating disorders of the brain, this rudimentary form of mind reading enables neurofeedback.
"Our brains control overt actions that allow us to interact directly with our environments, whether by swinging an arm or singing an aria," LaConte said.

"Covert mental activities, on the other hand - such as visual imagery, inner language, or recollections of the past - can't be observed by others and don't necessarily translate into action in the outside world," LaConte said.
But, LaConte added, brain-computer interfaces now enable us to eavesdrop on previously undetectable mental activities.
In the recent study, the scientists used whole-brain, classifier-based real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging to understand the neural underpinnings of brain-computer interface control.

Researchers asked two dozen subjects to control a visual interface by silently counting numbers at fast and slow rates.
For half the tasks, the subjects were told to use their thoughts to control the movement of the needle on the device they were observing; for the other tasks, they simply watched the needle.
The scientists discovered a feedback effect that LaConte said he had long suspected existed but had found elusive: the subjects who were in control of the needle achieved a better whole-brain signal-to-noise ratio than those who simply watched the needle move.
"When the subjects were performing the counting task without feedback, they did a pretty good job," LaConte said.

"But when they were doing it with feedback, we saw increases in the signal-to-noise ratio of the entire brain. This improved clarity could mean that the signal was sharpening, the noise was dropping, or both," said LaConte.
"When people undergoing real-time brain scans get feedback on their own brain activity patterns, they can devise ways to exert greater control of their mental processes," LaConte said.
"This, in turn, gives them the opportunity to aid in their own healing," said LaConte.