NGT refuses to entertain toddler's plea against 'noisy' school

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 03 2017 | 7:48 PM IST
A toddler's plea that the activities of a school in the neighbourhood was causing pollution, traffic jams and endangering the lives of the residents was today rejected by the National Green Tribunal.
A bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice Swatanter Kumar said merely stating that the school was creating noise through "loud speakers, ringing of bells" was not sufficient enough to show as to what parameters have been violated.
21-month-old Baby Arshita Khatri, her mother and grandmother have alleged that the running of the school in Ashok Vihar area of North Delhi created safety hazards, caused traffic congestion and endangered the safety of the residents of the locality, besides causing air and noise pollution.
The plea also said that the vehicles of the school, parked outside the premises, caused pollution.
However, the NGT refused to agree with the contention that the residents were suffering from various diseases due to pollution as there was no corroborative evidence to substantiate it.
"No cogent evidence has been placed on record to show as to how the relevant rules have not been followed by the school. The very fact that the applicants have raised many objections starting from allotment of land, construction etc. since a long time further shows that the alleged noise pollution is not the primary cause and the motive behind several objections raised by the applicants, as reflected from the multiple prayers sought, is something else.
"In absence of any specific averment and evidence, it cannot be adjudicated as to whether respondent school is presently violating the noise pollution rules," the NGT said.
The green panel, however, directed the DAV Public School located in Ashok Vihar Phase-IV to obtain permission from the authority under Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000, for using loud speakers.
"Further, they are directed to seek prior permission from the authorities in respect of incidents or operation or for any function which may fall within the purview of Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000," the bench also comprising Justice Raghuvendra S Rathore, said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 03 2017 | 7:48 PM IST

Next Story