The PRP partners were accused of buying 10.88 acres of temple land by fraudulent means some years ago on a complaint given by one Gopalakrishnan.
Magistrate Mahendra Boopathy said there was no prima facie case to indicate that impersonation or forgery of documents had taken place.
It was a civil dispute and only a civil court could decide on the issue. Only after the civil court decided on the matter, a criminal case could be filed.
More than 200 criminal cases had been filed against PRP granites and other firms and this was the first criminal case to be decided.
Besides purchasing land by fraudulent means, the granite company had been accused of damaging irrigation channels, water sources and causing a loss to the tune of Rs 16,000 crore by resorting to illegal mining.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
