The Madras High Court Monday ruled out deployment of CISF for security and refuted the argument that the Tamil Nadu police were not able to control the crowd to have darshan of Lord Athivaradar at the Devaraja Swamy temple in Kancheepuram.
A division bench of Justice S Manikumar and Justice Subramonium Prasad disposed of different petitions on the deaths during the festival and lack of facilities at the temple, among other issues.
"It is stated that 34 lakh devotees have so far visited the temple and have had darshan," the bench said.
Therefore, the argument of the petitioners that the local police were not able to control the crowd and seeking CISF personnel does not hold water, it said.
The bench said some inconvenience would have been caused to the local people going by the rush of devotees during the 48-day old festival at the temple.
But to maintain law and order and public order, the bench said, the state government has to take reasonable precautions and steps which are in the interest of public even if they caused inconvenience to local residents and devotees.
Refusing to accept the arguments that local residents' vehicles were prohibited around the temple temporarily, the bench said it cant be said to be excessive regulation.
On the claim that darshan was restricted, the bench said, "Whether it is a part of religion or not and whether Article 25 of the Constitution of India has been affected by the temporary measure during these days, we have been taken through the route map of the temple and it has been stated that keeping in view of the crowd that assembles a decision has been taken to prohibit entry and to ensure smooth flow of devotees..."
Observing that it can only be a practice of a person to go to the temple to worship, the bench said,"It does not form an integral part of the religion to go to the temples, making it a fundamental right."
The judges said, "We further observe during festivals, when large number of devotees assemble, the state should be given the freedom of action to regulate the timings, days of darshan in the temple."
The bench, while refuting the argument that not allowing to worship the Lord is violative of rule 8,9, of the Tamil Nadu Temple Entry Authorisation Act, 1947, said, "The rule has no relevance to the decision of the government to regulate the entry of devotees for a period of 48 days."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
