No provision in law for 21 parliamentary secys: Centre to HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 13 2016 | 5:29 PM IST
Opposing the appointment of 21 parliamentary secretaries by the Aam Aadmi Party government, the Centre today told Delhi High Court that it could have only one attached to Chief Minister of Delhi as per the existing provisions of law.
"That the post of parliamentary secretaries neither finds place in the Constitution of India, nor does it find place in the Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act of 1997, except for the post of Parliamentary Secretary to the Chief Minister.
"Therefore, appointment of 21 parliamentary secretaries vide the impugned order dated March 13, 2015, is not covered by the law," the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) told a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal.
The MHA, represented by Central Government standing counsel Jasmeet Singh, made the submission in an affidavit filed in response to the court's notice to the Centre on an NGO's PIL seeking quashing of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's March 13 order appointing 21 Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLAs as Parliamentary Secretaries.
In its affidavit, MHA also said that Delhi government had tried to legalise the appointment of the 21 parliamentary secretaries by amending the Delhi Members of Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualification) Act, but the President has withheld his assent to the amendment bill.
The high court did not hear arguments in the matter today after the Delhi government said that a petition has been moved before Election Commission for disqualification of the 21 MLAs and the poll panel has issued notice in that.
The bench, thereafter, listed the matter for hearing on September 8.
The AAP government had told the court that no office akin
to the Council of Ministers has been created and no additional hierarchy imposed upon the legislative assembly.
It had also stated that the parliamentary secretaries were not given any access to confidential documents which are exclusively within the domain of the Minister.
The NGO Rashtriya Mukti Morcha had claimed in its plea that the Chief Minister had issued "unconstitutional and illegal order" in gross violation of the constitutional provisions and the Transaction of Business of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi rules, 1993.
Denying the NGO's allegation, the Delhi government had said it was not bypassing the statutory functions of the LG.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 13 2016 | 5:29 PM IST

Next Story