Nonagenarian moves SC against life term in 1978 murder case

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 15 2018 | 5:45 PM IST

A 93-year-old man today moved the Supreme Court challenging the life sentence awarded to him in a 40-year-old murder case.

The matter was mentioned for urgent listing before a vacation bench of justices U U Lalit and Deepak Gupta.

"You mention this matter before the next vacation bench (which would sit from June 18)," the bench told the counsel appearing for petitioner Rohtas.

Advocates Yadunandan Bansal and Amit Kumar, who have filed the appeal against the Allahabad High Court's judgement, said that the petitioner was suffering from ailments due to which he was unable to move his right portion of body.

The plea said that medical reports of the petitioner have showed that there was blockage in his brain due to which he could go into coma or paralysis in whole body.

The high court, in its February 12 verdict, had dismissed the appeal filed by Rohtas and two others who were convicted and awarded life term by a trial court in 1983.

According to the police, the incident took place in Bagpat district of Uttar Pradesh on September 29, 1978 when two parties had a scuffle over harvesting crop from a piece of land in which some persons were injured.

The police had claimed that the incident had occurred due to land dispute between the parties and Rohtas along with others had assaulted the members of opposite party.

One person died due to the injuries sustained in the incident.

These accused had denied the allegations levelled against them and had told the high court that one of them had lodged a complaint with the police about the incident.

They had pleaded 'right to self defence' before the high court and had contended that one of them had also sustained serious injuries during the scuffle.

However, the high court had dismissed the appeal filed by the accused persons.

In the appeal filed before the top court, the petitioner has alleged that the high court has erred in not considering several facts in the case, including that one of the accused was also grievously injured in the incident.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 15 2018 | 5:45 PM IST

Next Story