The Express Tribune, citing sources, reported that the Pakistan Foreign Office has sent a letter to the Hague-based ICJ's registrar, expressing Pakistan's desire for a quick hearing, preferably over the next few weeks.
The request was made in view of the upcoming elections for ICJ judges, scheduled to be held in November, it quoted the sources as saying.
A senior official, however, was quoted as saying that the ICJ might resume the hearing in the case in October.
Pakistan's Attorney-General Ashtar Ausaf Ali is expected to attend the ICJ proceedings. The federal government, however, has not taken any decision about replacing Pakistan's attorney Khawar Quraishi.
"His performance is satisfactory...He raised all (relevant) legal points during the hearing," a senior official of the law ministry was quoted as saying.
The report, citing sources, also said the government was considering a few names for nominating them for the post of adhoc ICJ judge.
The name of a senior lawyer was also under consideration, it said.
India on May 8 had moved the ICJ against the death penalty handed down to Jadhav by a Pakistani military court.
Legal experts were beginning to wonder why Pakistan wants to appoint a foreigner as an adhoc judge when every state prefers to nominate its own lawyers, the report said.
They are calling on the attorney-general's office to consult local lawyers before finalising a legal strategy in this regard, it said.
A senior lawyer, with vast experience of international arbitration, was quoted as saying that it was necessary to revamp the legal wing of the Foreign Office because it failed to give proper advice to deal with Jadhav's case.
He pointed out that "India's success rate was 60 per cent".
"We have lost important cases at international forums over the past couple of years, while spending more than a billion rupees in lawyers' fees," he said.
According to Sheikh, the mishandling of Jadhav's case was a classic example of how the power struggle between military and political institutions played out and gaps in foreign policy and national security perspectives grew.
"State may suffer irreparable damage if gaps are not immediately bridged...In the national interest by both centres of power," Sheikh said.
"We are in no hurry to execute him (Jadhav) as he is making more disclosures," he claimed.
Jadhav's case is the latest flash-point in the tensions between Pakistan and India. The two countries last faced off at the ICJ 18 years ago when Islamabad sought its intervention over the shooting down of its naval aircraft.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
