Par panel to hear stakeholders' views on Taj's discolouration

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 09 2015 | 8:52 PM IST
Concerned over reports indicating that the colour of Taj Mahal was turning yellow due to increasing pollution, a parliamentary panel today said it will study the matter after hearing the views of government officials and stakeholders involved in its protection.
Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Science and Technology, Environment and Forest will take the opinion of top ranking officials of both the Centre and Uttar Pradesh government tomorrow and then study their views. It may also send a team to visit the site, if needed.
"The meeting will be held tomorrow. There has been a report that Taj Mahal is getting discoloured. This is an extremely important subject.
"Taj Mahal is a world heritage site and India is proud of it. Two scientists have done research and have said that it is due to the carbon particles that the colour of Taj is changing into yellow. When I read this report in the newspaper, I thought it was necessary to discuss this issue. We (PSC) will be discussing it tomorrow," PSC's chairman and MP Ashwani Kumar told reporters.
He said that various organisations which are in charge of protecting the Taj Mahal apart from UP Pollution Control Board, Environment Secretary and other officials have been called tomorrow. Civil society members will also participate in the discussion.
A recent Indo-US study has claimed that Taj Mahal is slowly turning brownish-yellow because of air pollution.
It said that Taj is changing colour due to deposition of dust and carbon containing particles emitted in the burning of fossil fuels, biomass and garbage.
"Remarks given by them (stakeholders) to the committee tomorrow will be studied. If there is a necessity of a visit, then it will be done. If it is felt that some more organisations, officials or civil societies have to be talked to, then we will do so," Kumar said.
He said that he has received a very detailed representation describing in length about the possible problems the heritage structure can face.
"The general idea is to give a very thoughtful consideration to these matters which have actually invited adverse public reactions. That is why, it is only fair that MPs dealing with the subject are made aware," Kumar said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 09 2015 | 8:52 PM IST

Next Story