He reiterated the need for reconstituting Infosys board, stating that the golden standards of governance and value system that Infosys was known for is "being decimated under the current leadership".
The comments follow eruption of a fresh row between the founders and the current management.
"I tell all subordinates that you have to sacrifice and you have to make sure your wage increase will be less, we have to cut costs while I will take 40-50 per cent increase (in compensation hike), I think it is terrible for any leadership to do," he told ET Now.
This is not the first time that questions have been raised on decisions taken by the Infosys board. Two months ago, high payouts to CEO Vishal Sikka and former employees, Rajiv Bansal and David Kennedy, had triggered a rift between the board and the company's founders.
The promoters -- which include the founders -- together hold about 13 per cent stake in the Bengaluru-based company.
"I think Infosys is a golden standard in terms of governance, disclosure and value system. I think it is being decimated under the current leadership. I think the board is not acting the way it should be," Balakrishnan said.
The resolution, which was put to vote between February 23 and March 31, saw only 24 per cent of the promoters voting in favour of the resolution while the rest abstained.
Overall, Rao's salary hike was passed with 67 per cent votes cast in favour and about 33 per cent of the votes against the proposal.
Murthy has previously also publicly aired his views on what he referred to as "poor governance standards" at Infosys. He had also questioned the steep severance payments made to former employees asking if the same was "hush money".
He, however, clarified that the abstention from voting was not a reflection of his faith in Rao.
The tussle also saw whistleblowers sending letters to market regulator Sebi alleging irregularities in Infosys' USD 200 million acquisition of Israeli firm Panaya.
Asked if it was necessary for the promoters to go public on the issue, Balakrishnan said the board has been taking the feedback, but had not acted on the same.
"I think there are a lot of engagements that happened in the non-public way, but that has not come into any resolution. They had been taking the feedback and not acting on it. That is why it is becoming public," he added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
