Performing certain municipal functions does not make NOIDA a municipality: SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 03 2018 | 9:25 PM IST

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) cannot acquire the essential features of a municipality merely because it performs certain municipal functions, the Supreme Court today said while dismissing an appeal filed by the authority against IT assessment notices issued to it in 2003.

A bench comprising justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan said that the authority is not covered by the definition of local authority as contained in explanation to section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act.

Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act deals with the income of the local authorities.

"It is true that various municipal functions are also being performed by the authority as per Act, 1976 but the mere facts that certain municipal functions were also performed by the authority it cannot acquire the essential features of the municipality which are contemplated by Part IXA of the Constitution, the bench said.

NOIDA had approached the apex court challenging the Allahabad High Court decision of 2011, dismissing its writ petition filled by it against the notices issued by the Income Tax department.

The authority was created under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 to provide for the development of certain areas in the state into industrial and urban township.

NOIDA had claimed that it has assumed the character of a local authority and was therefore eligible for tax exemption as provided for under Section 10 of the IT Act.

The dispute on the issue first arose in 2013, when the I-T department imposed a tax liability on the banks for non-deduction of TDS on the interest income on fixed deposit receipts (FDRs) of NOIDA.

Against the decision to levy tax, the banks preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), saying NOIDA was a corporation.

The appeal was decided in favour of the banks and, thereafter, the department preferred a petition before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which again decided in the favour of the banks.

The I-T department had also moved the apex court saying the issue for consideration was whether NOIDA is a corporation entitled for exemption from deduction of income tax at source under the provisions of a notification issued in 1970 under the Income Tax Act.

It has said that the high court erred in holding that NOIDA is covered under exemption from TDS under the Income Tax Act and the banks are not liable to deduct tax at source on interest paid to the NOIDA on its FDRs.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 03 2018 | 9:25 PM IST

Next Story