PIL against Sasikala not listed for hearing in SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 07 2017 | 9:42 PM IST
The PIL moved in the Supreme Court seeking to restrain AIADMK leader V K Sasikala from being sworn in as Tamil Nadu chief minister could not be listed for hearing today as certain "defects" in it need to be cured.
Sources said the petitioner has now engaged a lawyer and efforts were on to cure the defects cited by the court registry.
The petition filed by Chennai-resident Senthil Kumar, General Secretary of NGO Satta Panchayat Iyakkam, is not there in the mentioning list for tomorrow and there is all likelihood that his advocate would make a mention of it before an appropriate bench for urgent hearing tomorrow.
The petition was hurriedly filed yesterday seeking a stay on swearing-in of Sasikala as Tamil Nadu chief minister as there was speculation that she would be taking the oath today itself.
The petitioner has sought a restrain on her swearing-in after a bench had yesterday said that it would pronounce within a week the judgement in a 19-year-old disproportionate assets case in which she and late CM J Jayalalithaa were accused.
Kumar sought a stay on Sasikala's swearing-in contending that if she was convicted and forced to resign, there could be a "possibility of riots erupting all over Tamil Nadu".
He said the law and order situation may worsen in such an eventuality as the state was already facing a "desperate situation" due to cyclone, demonetisation and death of Jayalalithaa.
The petitioner claimed in case the appeal against her acquittal results in conviction, the AIADMK workers may once again protest and disturb the normal life in Tamil Nadu.
He said he filed the plea in the interest of the people of Tamil Nadu and to maintain peace in the state.
(Reopens LGD45)
Jayalalitha, along with her aides Sasikala, V N Sudhakaran and J Elavarasi were booked under various sections of Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC for allegedly amassing wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income in 1997.
The trial of the case was shifted by the Supreme Court to Bengaluru on a petition filed by a DMK leader and the court there had convicted them on September 27, 2014.
However, the Karnataka High Court had reversed the special court's judgment on May 11, 2015.
The Karnataka government had filed an appeal against it in the Supreme Court.
The apex court had last year, before the demise of Jayalalithaa, reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka HC order.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 07 2017 | 9:42 PM IST

Next Story