PIL to recruit women in Territorial Army: HC reserves verdict

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 30 2017 | 6:35 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today reserved its verdict on a PIL alleging discrimination against women in the recruitment for the Territorial Army (TA), the second line of defence after the regular army.
"Judgement reserved," a bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said after arguments on behalf of the Centre, the petitioner and the amicus curiae appointed by the court.
Petitioner Kush Kalra, in his plea, has alleged "institutionalised discrimination" against women for not being recruited in the TA, which is an organisation of volunteers who get military training in order to be mobilised for the country's defence in case of an emergency.
The court had earlier asked the central government and the Army why women were not considered fit for the TA, in which actor Mohanlal and cricketers Kapil Dev and M S Dhoni are honorary members holding senior ranks.
The government had taken the stand that women were not recruited in the TA infantry, but there was no bar besides this.
However, its lawyer could not answer a question regarding which were the positions in the TA where women were working.
In his plea, Kalra has contended that unlike the Indian armed forces, TA is not a profession, occupation or source of employment and meant for those who are already in civilian jobs.
He has said that gainful employment or self-employment in a civil profession was a pre-requisite for joining the TA which plays the role of "relieving the regular army from static duties and assist the civil administration in dealing with natural calamities...."
The petitioner has contended that the "state has a duty to ensure that there is no discrimination practised by anyone in the country and non-recruitment of female candidates who are gainfully employed is against the spirit of the Constitution".
He has sought that the provisions of the Act which prohibit recruitment of women into the TA be either struck down or interpreted in such a manner that both sexes can join the organisation.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 30 2017 | 6:35 PM IST

Next Story