Prasad for making 'pro bono' aid a precondition for elevation

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 09 2017 | 9:32 PM IST
The government today pitched for making free legal aid extended by a lawyer to the poor as an "important precondition" for elevating them as judges of constitutional courts.
Addressing a gathering in the presence of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, law minster Ravi Shankar Prasad said the time has come to explore the possibility of making genuine pro-bono (usually legal work undertaken for free for poor clients) lawyering as an important precondition for elevating an advocate as a judge of a high court or the Supreme Court.
"I feel very strongly about it. When I talk of pro-bono lawyering, I am very clear, I mean legal aid wth empathy and compassion and not for publicity.
"I think my lords are seasoned men to segregate as to which lawyer is giving legal advice as a proforma compliance and who is giving with commitment," he said.
A senior government functionary recently said the guidelines laid down by the apex court outlining the importance of pro bono has "strengthened" the feeling in the government that "pro bono lawyering" be made a prerequisite for becoming a judge.
Like getting the gown of a Senior advocate, pro bono activity can easily be a criterion for becoming a judge for those coming to the bench from active bar service, he said.
Pro bono is something which is done for the public good without any payment or compensation.
The guidelines fixed by the Supreme Court for itself and the 24 high courts last month to govern the exercise of designating lawyers as Seniors, talk about pro bono activities undertaken by an advocate.
Under the new system, all matters related to designation of Senior advocates would be looked at by a committee which will consider the reputation, conduct, integrity of the advocate, including participation in pro bono work, reported judgement in which the advocate has appeared and the number of such judgements.
But the Supreme Court collegium -- a body of top five judges of the apex court which recommends people it finds fit for appointment as judges -- will have to take a final call on the issue.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 09 2017 | 9:32 PM IST

Next Story