The court said compensation in monetary damages can never set the record straight or restore the damaged reputation caused by a libelous news report.
"I may also record that in my opinion the harm done by defamation to the reputation of a person, a direction to issue a public apology or a direction to correct the errors, if any, particularly in defamation arising out of libel by media, appears to be a more appropriate relief than a relief of monetary damages," a bench of Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw said.
In 1997, the magazine had published an article on the business of counterfeiting well-known brands and the lawyer was shown standing next to a few products.
Though the court rejected the plaint, but directed the magazine to publish a clarification within six weeks.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
