Public transport does not aid spread of flu

Myth Busted! Contrary to popular belief, people who use public transport are no more likely to catch flu than those who drive or cycle, doctors say.
In fact, people who do not take public transport are slightly more likely to catch it than those who are crammed into trains and buses every morning, according to research.
A survey of nearly 6,000 British people undertaken by doctors from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine found that there was "absolutely no indication" that buses and trains are the hotbed of viruses they are often thought to be, The Independent reported.

The discovery was made by analysis of this year's annual Flusurvey report in UK. Participants were asked to record whether or not they experienced flu-like symptoms and to give information about their lifestyles.
The two sets of data were combined to create a picture of trends in the spread of flu in the UK, particularly during the winter months.
Dr Alma Adler, a researcher in the field of infectious diseases, said that because the survey collected information direct from the public, rather than from hospitals or General Practitioners, it could be more effective at mapping infection, because many people with flu do not visit a doctor and so do not show up in surveillance.

Participants were asked to report whether they had flu, and to rate how bad their symptoms were on a scale of one to 100.

The researchers said they also may have also debunked another common myth about flu - that men complain more about it than women: a condition known commonly as "man-flu".
"In our sample 36.7 per cent of men versus 49.6 per cent of women reported a flu-like illness at least once," said Adler.
"Not only are women more likely to report flu. They actually reported feeling worse than the men did," she said.