Rajan blasts IMF for being soft on easy money policies of West

Reserve Bank Governor Raghuram Rajan today took his umbrage against the accommodative monetary policies of the developed nations to the doors of the IMF and blamed it for remaining a sideline player and even praising such polices which are wreaking havoc in emerging markets.
Multilateral lenders like IMF must look out for and contain the spillover effects of the near-decade long easy flow of hot money, he said.
His comments are significant as the Governor, who was a chief economist at the Fund earlier, is slated to address the IMF meeting next month in Turkey.
"The International Monetary Fund is supposed to look at these (easy money polices) in a global sense, but the IMF has been sitting on the sidelines, and even applauding these kinds of policies ever since they were initiated and hasn't really questioned the value of these kinds of policies," Rajan said.

There were rumours that Rajan is looking for the top job at the Fund post the RBI stint. But he denied the rumours.
Addressing an event on G-20 consultation meeting, organised by the foreign policy think tank Gateway House, Rajan was quick to add that he was "not pointing finger at any central bank. We haven't got mandates for the world. And I want to argue that we are in a world that nothing prevents these kinds of policies. There is nobody looking at them."

Explaining his position further the Governor, who has for long been critical of the ultra-loose money policies of the Western nations and had gone public with his criticism thrice in recent past, said though the IMF does spillover studies, "these spillover studies invariably say this is good for that country and therefore good for the whole world. So I think we need to examine these issues."

Rajan admitted that across the world central banking mandates are domestic, as "no central bank has a mandate for the world. Its mandate is purely domestic...What are you going to do to elevate employment and growth.
"It has to worry about the world only at second level... if I do something which creates problems for another country and as a result demand from that country falls off from my country's, I should take that into account. I don't care if I destroy the other country completely, so long as it doesn't import from me I am okay. That kind of domestic mandate is actually in every country.