Gandhi, who was addressing students at University of California, Berkeley, said around 2012 the Congress Party "stopped having conversations with people".
He said this could be a problem for any party which is in power for 10 years.
"The vision that we laid out in 2004 was designed at best for a 10-year period. And it was pretty clear that the vision that we laid out in 2004 by the time we arrived in 2010-11 was not working anymore," the 47-year-old leader said.
When asked if he wanted to take up an executive role in the Congress Party, he responded by saying, "I am absolutely ready to do that".
However, he quickly left the decision on his party.
"We have an organisational election process that decides that. And that process is currently ongoing. So we have an internal system where we elect certain delegates who make that decision. So for me to say that that decision is mine that wouldn't be very fair.
When asked whether the Congress party was more associated with dynastic politics, Gandhi argued that India is being run by dynasties.
"Most parties in India have that problem So...Mr Akhilesh Yadav is a dynast. Mr Stalin is a dynast... Even Abhishek Bachchhan is a dynast. So that's how India runs. So don't get after me because that's how they India is run. By the way, last, I recall, Mr Ambanis are running the business. That's also going on in Infosys. So that's what happens in India," he said.
"And I can name them in every state. There are also people who happen to have a father, or a grandmother or a great grandfather in politics. They do exist," he said.
"The real question is the person actually capable person is the person a sensitive person and that's the question," he said.
He also said the BJP is implementing most of the programmes initiated during the Congress' rule.
"The central architecture they borrowed from us. But that architecture does not work. Because we know it. It stopped working," he said.
"The idea of non-violence is what has allowed this huge mass of people to rise up together."
He also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policies.
"Whereas I completely agree with their positioning as far as the (ties with) the US is concerned, I think they're making India vulnerable because, if you look at Nepal, the Chinese are there. If you look at Burma the Chinese are there. If you look at Sri Lanka, the Chinese are there. If you look at Maldives, the Chinese are there," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
