River pollution: SC summons WB secy for not filing reply

The Supreme Court today rapped the West Bengal government for not filing a reply to a PIL on release of untreated effluents by industries and other bodies into rivers across the country and asked its environment secretary to appear before it on February 22.
"Why should we waste time with you (lawyer for the state). Your environment secretary will be before us on day after tomorrow.
"Every other state has filed its reply and you choose not to file it. Ask your (environment) secretary to remain present," a bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar said when the counsel for the state government sought two weeks more time to file the counter affidavit in the case.

The apex court had earlier issued notice to the Centre, the Ministry of Environment and Forests, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and Chief Secretaries of 19 states, including Gujarat, on the plea filed by NGO Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti on the issue of pollution in water bodies, including ground water.
Initially, the plea was restricted to Gujarat and later its scope was widened by the apex court which had granted last opportunity to states on January 16 to file their response.
At the outset, the bench, also comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud and S K Kaul, said that it would pass an order on February 22 on the issues including stoppage of industrial activity till effluent treatment plants are set up by the industries and inquired from CPCB about the possible time taken in establishing the sewage treatment plants (STPs).

Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for the NGO, said that there has been rise of 300 to 400 per cent in release of untreated liquid wastes in rivers across the country.

"We may forthwith stop the release of industrial effluents and will allow them to release after they set up the sewage treatment plants. One way is to stop the polluting industries," the court said.
When the counsel for parties tried to elaborate upon the processes involved in the sewage treatment, it said, "You keep saying. We keep listening. But nothing is happening.
The bench had said, "Is some kind of panchayat going on

here that the states are not serious? Why are you joking with the Supreme Court like this? You will understand the importance only when we call your chief and environment secretaries."
Perusing the records, the court had said that Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Kerala, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh have not filed their reply and had granted four weeks to the states which appeared before it for the first time in the matter.
It had summoned the environment secretaries with relevant records of the states, which had been served notice but had failed to file reply and had listed the plea for hearing today.

The PIL has raised concern over "massive" pollution of India's water bodies, including groundwater and sea water around the coasts that put at risk the health and livelihood of "millions of people, and the health of animals, flora and fauna".
Among several other issues, the PIL has sought the court's direction to respondents to ensure that no effluent and pollutant beyond the prescribed norms flow into any water body or seep into the soil. No industrial unit be permitted to function unless it has an effluent treatment plant that meets the norms, it has said.
The petitioner has said there was concern over massive pollution, particularly in the rivers, water bodies, as also in air and land in 43 of India's 'critically polluted clusters' and 32 'severely polluted clusters'.

The 'critically polluted clusters', as defined by CPCB, included six places each in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, five in Maharashtra, four in Tamil Nadu, three each in Odisha, West Bengal and Rajasthan, two each in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana, one each in Kerala, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and parts of Delhi.