S Africa's Zuma under fire over for 'security' revamp: report

Image
AFP Johannesburg
Last Updated : Nov 29 2013 | 10:37 PM IST
South Africa's President Jacob Zuma personally benefitted from the controversial security renovations at his private home and must repay the state, a damning watchdog report leaked to a local newspaper said today.
The government has spent at least 200 million rand (USD 20 million) to revamp Zuma's rural home -- including a swimming pool and an outdoor amphitheatre -- justifying it as necessary security for a head of state.
But a government watchdog in a report titled 'Opulence on a Grand Scale' has found that Zuma derived "substantial" benefit from the deal, South Africa's weekly Mail & Guardian reported.
Some of the so-called security upgrades were "improperly" weaved into the project at "enormous cost" to the taxpayer, it said.
A swimming pool, a marquee area, a visitors' waiting area, a cattle enclosure, houses for the president's relatives and "extensive" paving, were some of the extras that did not necessarily fit into security features, according to a yet-unpublished report by Public Protector Thuli Madonsela.
South Africa's public protector investigates reported abuse of power by public officials, publishes the findings, and recommends prosecution where needed.
Madonsela wants Zuma to explain himself to parliament and repay the extra non-security expenses, the paper said citing the report.
The improvements at Zuma's house were "acutely" better than those done at past presidents' properties, said the report.
The most expensive renovations so far had been at the house of South Africa's first black leader Nelson Mandela, which cost 32 million rands (USD 3.2 million).
She also said "genuine" security issues such as the two helipads, a clinic and housing for the police protection unit at the thatched-roof compound were "excessive". Above all, they could have been located in a nearby town to also benefit local residents, the report said.
The public protector's office declined to comment on the newspaper's story on Friday, but last week Madonsela said four ministers seen as Zuma's loyalists, had tried to vet her report by approaching the court to instruct her on what to "throw out and what to retain".
The government's decision to spend large sums of taxpayer money on Zuma's private property sparked public anger amid an economic crunch in a country where 10 million people live on social grants and many have only tin shacks as homes.
The exact cost of the upgrades remains unclear. Two weeks ago, a parliament panel put it at 206 million rand (USD 20.2 million). The Mail & Guardian reported the costs at 215 million rand.
Zuma's office did not respond to phone calls and an email seeking comment.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 29 2013 | 10:37 PM IST

Next Story