SC dismisses poll petition against ex-CM's son

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 22 2017 | 12:07 PM IST
Upholding a Bombay High Court order, the Supreme Court has dismissed an election petition filed against Amit Deshmukh, Maharashtra MLA and son of former Maharashtra Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh, alleging he had indulged in "corrupt practices".
A division bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Ashok Bhushan, dismissed the petition saying "we do not find any legal and valid ground for interference. The special leave petition is dismissed. Consequently, all the pending applications therein are also disposed of."
The election petition, which was dismissed by the apex court earlier this month, was filed by Annarao Govindrao Patil, who lost the 2014 assembly election to Amit Deshmukh of Congress from Latur constituency by a huge margin.
The total votes polled were 2,03,453, of which Deshmukh (respondent 1) had secured 1,19,653 votes. Anna Patil got only 400 votes and lost his deposit.
Being aggrieved, he filed a petition in the Aurangabad bench of Bombay High Court alleging that Deshmukh had exceeded the limit of expenditure fixed by the Election Commission.
The high court on July 18, 2016, dismissed the petition for want of material facts in support of the allegations of corrupt practices.
The defeated candidate then filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court challenging the high court order. The apex court too dismissed the election petition saying that there was no ground for the Supreme Court to interfere with the high court order.
Amit Deshmukh filed an affidavit through his lawyers K K Venugopal and Dilip Taur denying the allegations in the election petition and contending that they were baseless.
The petitioner had claimed that the winning candidate was influential as was the son of former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, he had used his influence in the election process and indulged in corrupt practices by spending more than the permissible limit of Rs 28 lakh in the election.
After hearing both sides, the Supreme Court opined that no case had been made out against Deshmukh and dismissed the petition.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 22 2017 | 12:07 PM IST

Next Story