SC issues notice to Centre on plea challenging Passport Rules, Foreigners Order

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 25 2019 | 7:55 PM IST

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Centre's response on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of the amended passport rules and the foreigners order of 2015, which regularised the entry and stay of illegal immigrants in India allegedly on the basis of religion.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjiv Khanna issued notices to the Centre, the Ministry of External Affairs and the Tripura government and sought their responses on a plea filed by the Tripura People's Front (TPF), challenging the validity of the Passport (Entry into India) Amendment Rules, 2015 and the Foreigners (Amendment) Order, 2015.

The petition claimed that the new rules and order had introduced religion as a new principle in the citizenship law, describing it as "communally-motivated humanitarianism".

"The sub-ordinate legislations impugned are, however, unprecedented in the sense that never before has religion been specifically identified in the citizenship law as the ground for distinguishing between citizens and non-citizens. They have introduced religion as a new principle in the citizenship law and can be conveniently branded as 'communally motivated humanitarianism'," the plea said.

The illegal immigrants, who were to be granted the benefit of these legislations, had to qualify for citizenship only on the basis of religion and this requirement went against the principles of secularism, one of the basic tenets of the Constitution, it added.

The plea urged the court to strike down the Passport Rules, notified on September 7, 2015, and the Foreigners (Amendment) Order, which came into effect on September 7, 2015, by declaring those as "discriminatory, arbitrary and illegal".

It said the legislations "threaten the foundation of India's plural polity, where every citizen, regardless of his religious identity, is equal to every other in his enjoyment of the rights the Constitution confers on him".

The legislations defeated the purpose and opened the floodgates to more illegal immigration and consequently, increased claims on diminishing resources, the plea said.

The rules and the order regularised the entry and stay in India of the illegal immigrants belonging to certain religions like Hindus, Jains and Christians.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 25 2019 | 7:55 PM IST

Next Story