SC reserves order on maintainability of PIL on juvenile law

The Supreme Court today reserved its order on the maintainability of a PIL, filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, seeking fresh interpretation of the term 'juvenile' in the statute concerned.
"We will first decide the maintainability of your (Swamy) special leave petition and if we agree, only then, we will hear you on merits," a bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam said, adding the order would be pronounced within a week.
The order was reserved after Swamy clarified to the bench that his petition was not "individual-centric" and the reference of the juvenile, one of the accused in the December 16 gangrape case, in his plea was merely an illustration.

Additional Solicitor General Siddharth Luthra, appearing for the Centre, opposed the plea of Swamy and raised the plea of its maintainability on the ground that a third party has no legal authority to intervene.
"A third party intervention in a criminal case is not allowed and there was no problem if the petition is not individual-centric. Pandora's box would open if such kind of petitions are allowed," Luthra said.
The counsel for the juvenile, facing trial in the December 16 gangrape case, also took the identical plea and said Swamy is "neither the complainant nor a witness nor related to victim or to the accused".

"The whole objection is misconceived. I have not come against the order of Juvenile Justice Board. I have come against the order of the Delhi High Court. Moreover, the question of maintainability was not raised when the matter was first taken up by the High Court," Swamy said.