The Centre is "hell bent" on stalling the Assam NRC work, the Supreme Court said Tuesday while rapping it for seeking suspension of the process during upcoming Lok Sabha polls citing non-availability of security forces.
The apex court got irked when Attorney General K K Venugopal submitted that the process be suspended from the last date of submission of nomination papers till two weeks after the date of upcoming elections in view of the fact that 167 companies of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), engaged in Assam NRC work, would be sent to other parts of the country to maintain law and order during polls.
"We are sorry to say this. The MHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) is hell bent upon not to carry on the NRC process and it is destroying entire efforts being made by this court," said a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranan Gogoi and Justice R F Nariman.
The bench, which reiterated that it would not extend the deadline of July 31 for finalisation of NRC, also directed that 3,457 state government officers be kept free for NRC work and asked the Election Commission to "examine the case of exemption of officers, in the rank of District Magistrates, Additional District Magistrates...from transfers which are likely to be made in view of the elections".
Dissatisfied with the response of a MHA official over the availability of CAPF and the total number of companies which would be needed during polls, the irked CJI said, "Do you want us to summon the home secretary and other concerned officers".
When Venugopal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Assam government, attempted to intervene, the bench said that they (law officers) have not been briefed properly by officials.
"If you have the will then there are 100 ways to do the work. The Government of India is not cooperating at all. The NRC process is being stalled. The elections are definitely to be held peacefully and in order. Likewise, the NRC work has to go on peacefully and in order," the bench said, adding, "Are we asking too much from the government".
At the outset, Mehta apprised the bench that a meeting involving Assam chief secretary, NRC co-ordinator Prateek Hajela and the Secretary of the poll panel had taken place on January 29.
The attorney general said in 2014 Lok Sabha polls, 2,500 CAPF companies were deployed and this year, around 2,700 such companies would be needed to ensure law and order.
He said 167 CAPF companies, which are presently overseeing NRC works in Assam, would be sent to other parts of the country during elections.
"You (Centre) have 3,000 combined armed companies. You need 2,700 companies for polls. Assam NRC work requires 167 companies. So what is the problem," the bench asked.
"We need to protect the borders also. Security of country is involved," Venugopal said, adding that the government wanted suspension of NRC work from the date of notification of Lok Sabha polls to two weeks after the voting.
Venugopal, while seeking suspension of NRC work, also said it was anticipated to be a "highly surcharged political atmosphere" on the eve of elections and hearing of the NRC cases would not be conducive.
"We have considered the submissions...At this stage, we are not inclined to pass any orders on the said request (suspension)," the bench said.
It then took note of the report of Hajela on requirement of state officials for completion of NRC work.
"We direct that adequate number of State Government officials (number indicated by the State Coordinator as 3,457) which would consist of officers in different ranks as stated in the report, be kept free for NRC work. The availability of the said officers for NRC work would still leave out over 2,000 persons currently engaged in NRC work for being engaged in the election work at the relevant point of time," it said.
It also said the poll panel will consider the matter keeping in mind that this court, which has consistently monitored NRC work, was of the view that "least interference should come in such works so that final NRC is made and published on the stipulated date that it July, 31, 2019."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
