SC shocked over HC order reducing acid attacker's sentence

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 27 2017 | 9:02 PM IST
The Supreme Court today expressed "shock" at the approach of the Hyderabad High Court which had reduced the jail term of a man who threw acid on a girl for rejecting his marriage proposal, saying there was "no justification" for the act.
A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and R Banumathi set aside the verdict of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh which had reduced the sentence of the convict to 30 days, the period already undergone by him behind bars and restored it to one year jail term as awarded by a trial court.
It also awarded the victim, a young girl from Andhra Pradesh, a compensation of Rs 3.5 lakh while allowing her appeal against the verdict of the High Court.
"The approach of the High Court shocks us and we have no hesitation in saying so. When there is medical evidence that there was an acid attack on the young girl and the circumstances having brought home by cogent evidence and the conviction is given the stamp of approval, there was no justification to reduce the sentence to the period already undergone.
"We are at a loss to understand whether the learned Judge has been guided by some unknown notion of mercy or remaining oblivious of the precedents relating to sentence or for that matter, not careful about the expectation of the collective from the court, for the society at large eagerly waits for justice to be done in accordance with law, has reduced the sentence," the bench said.
As per the appeal of the victim, she was attacked with acid on her head by the accused in 2003 after her family had turned down his proposal to marry the victim.
The trial court had held him guilty under Section 326 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means) of the IPC and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for one year along with a fine of Rs 5,000.
The High Court had upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone by the convict behind bars, after which the victim approached the apex court contending that the period of custody suffered by the accused was a mere thirty days.
The apex court, while allowing her plea, said, "when a substantive sentence of 30 days is imposed in the crime of present nature, that is acid attack on a young girl, the sense of justice, if we allow ourselves to say so, is not only ostracized but also is unceremoniously sent to 'Vanaprastha'. It is wholly impermissible."
"We direct the accused to pay a compensation of Rs 50,000 and the State to pay a compensation of Rs 3 lakhs," it said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 27 2017 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story